VM0042 Agricultural Land Management

Gardens of Opportunity:
Lake Victoria Watershed Agroforestry

Developed in Partnership with



The sun is barely cutting through the leaves of the trees overhead and towering maize stalks, but it promises to deliver oppressive heat by midday. Already the air surrounding Joseph’s farm is warm and dry as he sips tea and finishes his githeri, a traditional meal, before heading out for the day. Patting his children’s heads on the way out as they prepare for school, he strides over to pick up a hoe and shovel next to the house before disappearing into the forest.  

He breathes in deeply the scent of damp soil and leaf litter, immediately feeling the cooler and moist temperature under the forest canopy. This is not a typical forest, however, that Joseph has chosen to plant on his farm. He’s standing in his four-year-old Forest Garden — a multistrata agroforestry system that he designed, planted, and now maintains through a partnership and training program with Trees for the Future (TREES), a nonprofit organization focused on land restoration in developing communities in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Five years ago, Joseph had few options other than farming maize and beans sustained through large doses of costly fertilizers and pesticides. The farm only produced two harvests per year for market, and no other crops for Joseph’s children or livestock to eat. Degraded soil health and poor water retention were constant challenges leaving dry, bare soil susceptible to increasing climatic pressures.

Investment from Catona Climate enabled TREES to work with farmers in western Kenya who were willing to enroll in their signature Forest Garden program. Joseph seized the opportunity to transform not just his farming practices, but his way of life. Through this up-front investment, TREES partnered with farmers to develop Forest Gardens, providing training, seeds, seedlings, equipment, and direct hands-on support to all 18,000+ participating farmers. This gave farmers the knowledge and tools to transform their land and sustain their Forest Gardens for decades to come. It’s a great example of how a project that removes carbon — in this case, an estimated 4.3 million tonnes of CO2e over its lifetime — is stronger and more impactful when it’s designed to benefit local communities and ecosystems as well.

After checking on some newly planted seedlings, Joseph weaves his way between rows of cabbages and pigeon peas to the back of his Forest Garden, where he’s growing mangos and bananas. He’s noticed more birds and amphibians on the land since he’s transformed his farm, evidence of agroforestry’s positive effects on biodiversity. He takes a machete to a large stalk laden with bananas that he plans to sell at the market tomorrow, which will provide income he can put toward school fees.  He hears his children’s voices filter through the leaves as they head out for school and smiles — knowing he is not just growing new crops, but building a home that will sustain his family for generations.

Project Highlights:

Updates & progress

Milestones &
Credit Issuance*

Project development and initial planting began in 2020 with a small number of farmers. An investment from Catona Climate followed, enabling TREES to work with farmers to scale the project, enrolling thousands more participants and hiring hundreds of local staff to deliver training and hands-on support to farmers. The project is expected to deliver its first carbon credits in 2027, and will undergo a verification every three years throughout the crediting period.

*Estimated credit issuance schedule. Subject to change.

News & Progress

Latest Updates

Project Design

Project Summary

This project is a prime example of the multiplier effect of a strong carbon project that puts community needs at the forefront of project design and implementation, and is a great example of the potential success of community-led agroforestry.

Est. 4.3 million tonnes of CO2e. Over the lifetime of the project, carbon removals will be achieved through the planting of agroforestry trees and soil carbon from regenerative farming practices.

Forest Garden Program. Buyers can purchase carbon credits, which will in turn provide revenue for TREES to continue to implement their program.

Direct Payments. 22.5% of carbon credit revenue will be paid directly to the 18,000+ farmers enrolled in the program. Additionally, all upfront project costs (seeds, equipment, training) are covered by Catona's investment.

Project Design

Community Impact & Benefits

The Forest Garden program enables farmers to transform their communities through a holistic approach to engagement and benefits, starting with farmer input on program design, contracts, grievance mechanisms, and market strategies. Feedback loops via Lead Farmer meetings and direct outreach to project technicians allow TREES to provide training and resources tailored to each farmer. Farmers benefit from increased farm productivity,  achieving higher yields and gaining access to diversified markets and carbon revenues — all while learning how to sustainably manage their farms for generations to come.

Project Summary

Environmental Impact & Benefits

Habitat restoration can look quite different depending on the landscape, species present, and land use goals. A key element of the Forest Garden design is directly in the name – Forest. As each Forest Garden has on average 5,800 trees planted throughout, the farmland begins to mimic a natural forest by providing habitat to wildlife species such as birds, insects, reptiles, amphibians, and small mammals. Soil health also improves as a result of regenerative agricultural practices, increasing fungal and microbial diversity. To track the change in biodiversity, TREES will focus on vocalizing species of wildlife (primarily birds) utilizing bioacoustic monitoring to study species richness over time as Forest Gardens mature.

Project Design

Project Design

Designing a Forest Garden

A Forest Garden is a sustainable, multi-crop agroforestry system designed to increase a farm’s productivity, crop diversity, and carbon potential — all the while restoring soil health, increasing water retention, reducing the need for synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, and sequestering carbon. TREES has worked directly with thousands of farmers across multiple countries to develop their signature Forest Garden program and tailor its design to meet individual farmer needs. All species are selected based on production yields, local market demand (to enable farmers to sell their extra produce), and climate resilience.

Project Design

Stakeholder Engagement

TREES uses a structured approach to engage stakeholders, identify farmer groups, develop contracts with farmers, and expand projects in Kenyan counties. This includes outreach to local governments, traditional leaders, and community-based organizations. TREES prioritizes vulnerable families such as women-headed households, and seeks buy-in through mobilization meetings and participatory planning. Farmers continue to receive direct support throughout project implementation from TREES technicians and are able to provide feedback and governance through their farmer groups and Lead Farmer representatives.

Project Due Diligence

Project Due Diligence

Prior Land Use

The Lake Victoria Watershed region of western Kenya is heavily dominated by smallholder agriculture with over 96% of the rural population reliant on subsistence farming.2 Most agricultural practices focus on monoculture cropping of maize and beans with a high use of pesticides and synthetic fertilizers to supplement degraded soils.  Without intervention, these areas face continued degradation from poor agricultural practices, biodiversity loss, and growing pressure on natural forests for fuelwood. The Forest Garden Approach puts farmers first, training them on sustainable and regenerative agroforestry practices to improve soil health, water conservation, and land productivity — transforming degraded agricultural lands, improving livelihoods, and reducing deforestation threats.

Project Due Diligence

Land Rights

As part of the stakeholder consultation process, TREES confirms that each farm enrolled is on privately owned land, and that the farmers have the use, access and management rights to the land planted as Forest Gardens.  Landholder agreements document tenure types (e.g. direct ownership vs inherited from a family member) confirmed by local Chiefs, and if a farm is passed to another family member or new owner during the project period, the new owner is able to join the carbon project and transfer the carbon agreement.

Project Due Diligence

Additionality

The project’s Forest Garden agroforestry practices and the resulting carbon removals are additional in that they would not occur under “business as usual” or in the absence of carbon markets. Additionality was determined during the project feasibility assessment of regulatory mandates, institutional barriers and regional common practice.

Project Due Diligence

Durability

Based on decades of experience delivering agroforestry training programs, and in partnership with farmers consulted throughout, TREES has structured and designed the Forest Garden program for maximum sustainability, durability and market opportunity. It is tailored to the farmer-identified needs that will sustain practices and carbon removal throughout the full 40-year permanence period. TREES will also monitor the project throughout this period and report any loss events to Verra so the project’s carbon credit buffer pool can be deducted accordingly. 

Project Due Diligence

Climate Permanence

Western Kenya is faced with unavoidable climate-driven challenges from rising temperatures and increasing droughts. Temperature is expected to increase in the project region6,7 across all Share Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP)8 scenarios as shown in the graph above, highlighting the need for increased climate resilience.

To counter these climatic trends,  the Forest Garden training program is designed to teach farmers how to integrate soil, water, and nutrient conservation practices into their Forest Gardens.

Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV)

Monitoring, Reporting, & Verification

Monitoring Carbon

Accurate carbon measurement is critical for correct carbon estimates and verifications.  The majority of carbon in a Forest Garden is contained in the woody biomass of trees and vegetation with the remaining stored in the soil. Woody biomass will be measured prior to each verification event (approx every three years), and soil organic carbon will be assessed every five years following the VM0042 methodology for accurate monitoring and RothC11 model calibration. Soil cores from both project areas and reference sites outside of the project area are collected and analyzed in the laboratory. Beyond this, Catona monitors aboveground biomass every year across each Forest Garden using remote biomass data from our partnership with Chloris Geospatial.12

Monitoring, Reporting, & Verification

Monitoring Environment

TREES uses acoustic monitoring to track species richness and satellite imagery to assess vegetation changes in Forest Gardens, data critical to adaptive management, farmer support, and compliance with Verra carbon credit permanence requirements.

Bioacoustic Monitoring. TREES and Catona have partnered with WildMon to utilize  bioacoustic monitoring technology with AI-driven data analysis to measure wildlife species richness (number of different species) in Forest Gardens as they mature.

Terrestrial Monitoring. TREES and Catona use high-resolution satellite imagery to track forest cover and vegetative changes in project farms, assessing landscape evolution within the project region. Spatial data is also used to monitor project risks and support adaptive management through direct communication of any risks to project management on the ground.

Monitoring, Reporting, & Verification

Monitoring Community

TREES conducts socioeconomic surveys every three years, tracking food security, dietary diversity, agricultural revenue, and project-scale employment. Surveys are randomized to ensure fairness, while metrics highlight the program’s economic and social impact.

Monitoring Updates

Project progress is tracked closely by TREES and Catona using a blend of in-situ data collection activities and remote observations, with the goal of maximizing impact to deliver the highest-integrity carbon credits.

Monitoring Updates

Climate Monitoring Updates

Carbon removals are measured at each project monitoring event prior to verifications where aboveground and belowground biomass and SOC data is collected. Alongside this, Catona tracks estimated aboveground biomass and CO2e each year using remotely sensed data to assess if the project is on track to meet its credit deliveries.

Last Updated: Dec. 2024 | § Biomass data from Chloris Geospatial is utilized by Catona solely for tracking project progress. This data does not influence, guide, or alter credit issuance in any capacity. Credit issuance is independently governed and controlled by Verra in accordance with its standards and methodologies.

Measuring Real Climate Impact

In 2024, Catona and TREES collaborated on a successful LiDAR and optical drone study measuring forest canopy height across the project area. The data will be used to further understand Forest Garden structure and species’ growth rates, as well as to calibrate remote sensing datasets and as training data for ongoing AI modeling activities.

Monitoring Updates

Community Monitoring Updates

Catona works closely with TREES to develop and track indicators over time to understand how to best support community members on the ground. Through monthly calls, quarterly reports, annual surveys and ongoing monitoring, both teams work directly with local communities to ensure their livelihoods are impacted in a meaningful way.

Last Updated: 2/7/25 | †Muthini, D., Nzuma, J. & Qaim, M., 2020. The impact of market access on smallholder farmers' participation in maize markets in Kenya. Food Policy, 95, p. 101956. ‡ Trees for the Future. 2024. Socio-economic Household Survey for the Lake Victoria Watershed Agroforestry Carbon Project (LVWCP), Western Kenya.

Uplifting Community Voices

TREES revamped its community grievance mechanism last year by building out a process for submitting, evaluating, and addressing grievances in an accessible and rapid manner. Farmers gave input into how they would like to submit grievances and be represented, which resulted in the establishment of local community Grievance Focal Points who are elected farmers from each community that have a direct link to the TREES grievance officer.

Monitoring Updates

Environment Monitoring Updates

From seed to Forest Garden, TREES and Catona track progress across every scale and every stage of the project. To date, 44.9 million trees have been planted, transforming farms into healthy and thriving Forest Gardens. Increases in biodiversity are tracked using AI-driven bioacoustic technology.

Last Updated: 2/7/25

Bioacoustic Study Results

TREES and Catona partnered with WildMon, a tech-forward biodiversity monitoring organization, to track biodiversity change over time as Forest Gardens mature. The bioacoustics study was expanded in 2024 to include additional Forest Garden sites and baseline conventional agricultural sites across Homa Bay and Migori Counties. Study results were encouraging with 148 species identified during the last sampling in 2024 and a clear trend that as Forest Gardens matured they provided greater habitat suitability for wildlife.

Registry Overview
Registry
Current Project Status
Under Validation
Methodology
VM0042 v2
Project ID
4408
Time to Verification
< 2 Years

Registry and Documents

Project Design Document

pdf - 0.89 MB uploaded on 02/07/25

Climate Monitoring Plan

pdf - 1.09 MB uploaded on 02/07/25

Forest Garden Model Design

pdf - 2.44 MB uploaded on 02/07/25

Forest Garden Farmer Training Calendar

pdf - 0.07 MB uploaded on 02/07/25

Forest Garden Technical Manual

pdf - 43.44 MB uploaded on 02/07/25

Secure Your Credits Now

Support this Project Now

Get in touch with one of our experts today to purchase credits from the Lake Victoria Watershed Agroforestry project. There’s limited inventory, act now.

*Required

References

1. Kirika, P. M., Wanza., Mungai, I., Nyongesa, C., Wamiti, W., Muchai, V., Atubwa, H., Muchane, M., Waithaka, K., Njorge, L., Nyandiala, A., Odeny, D., Thenya., T. 2023, Field Survey Report: Assessment of Biodiversity Resources and Hotspot Areas, Lake Victoria Watershed Project (Kisumu-Migori-Homabay).

2. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2023). The Kenya Poverty Report. Retrieved 29 January 2025, from https://new.knbs.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/The-Kenya-Poverty-Report-2021.pdf

3. Hansen, M.C., Potapov, P.V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S.A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S.V., Goetz, S.J., Loveland, T.R., Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C.O., & Townshend, J.R.G. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342(6160), 850–853. Retrieved 29 January 2025, from https://glad.earthengine.app/view/global-forest-change

4. Karra, K., Kontgis, C., Statman-Weil, Z., Mazzariello, J.C., Mathis, M., & Brumby, S.P. (2021). Global land use / land cover with Sentinel 2 and deep learning. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, Brussels, Belgium, 2021, pp. 4704–4707.https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553499

5. The Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry. (2022). Agroforestry: A Primer. CIFOR-ICRAF. Retrieved 29 January 2025, from https://www.cifor-icraf.org/publications/pdf/books/Agroforestry-primer.pdf

6. Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G.A., Senior, C.A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R.J., & Taylor, K.E. (2016). Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(5), 1937–1958.

7. World Bank. (2024). Climate Change Knowledge Portal. Retrieved 29 January 2025, from https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/

8. Meinshausen, M., Nicholls, Z.R., Lewis, J., Gidden, M.J., Vogel, E., Freund, M., Beyerle, U., Gessner, C., Nauels, A., Bauer, N., & Canadell, J.G. (2020). The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geoscientific Model Development, 13(8), 3571–3605.

9. Kenya Meteorological Department. (2025). Home. Retrieved 29 January 2025, from https://meteo.go.ke/

10. Schroeder, W., Oliva, P., Giglio, L., & Csiszar, I.A. (2014). The new VIIRS 375m active fire detection data product: Algorithm description and initial assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 143, 85–96. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.008.

11. Rothamsted Research. (2025). Rothamsted carbon model (RothC). Retrieved 29 January 2025, from https://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/rothamsted-carbon-model-rothc.

12. Catona (2024), Chloris Geospatial Partnership, Retrieved 29 January 2025, from https://catona.com/resources/chloris-geospatial-partnership/.

13. ICRAF. (2024). Land Health Decisions, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Retrieved 5 February 2025, from https://www.worldagroforestry.org/sd/landhealth/soil-plant-spectral-diagnostics-laboratory/sops

14. Muthini, D., Nzuma, J. & Qaim, M., 2020. The impact of market access on smallholder farmers' participation in maize markets in Kenya. Food Policy, 95, p. 101956.

15. WildMon. (2025). Ecoacoustic Biodiversity Monitoring in Forest Gardens in Homa Bay and Migori, Kenya.