This is the second installment in our blog series that will walk through monitoring components. In the first installment we discussed our use of geospatial data and remote sensing to track project quality. Today we’ll take a look at how Catona Climate works collaboratively with our project partners to measure climate, environmental, and community impact.

What makes a good carbon project?

We believe it’ll take more than avoiding carbon emissions or removing them from the atmosphere to achieve lasting climate impact. We also need to influence the driving factors behind climate change: ecosystem health and resilience, and people’s ability to live and thrive sustainably off the land.

So at Catona Climate, a “high-quality” project is one that not only follows the most scientifically-backed standards, but also holistically integrates climate, environmental, and community benefits throughout its lifecycle.

A key part of Catona Climate’s Monitoring & Engagement strategy is gathering the data to measure and demonstrate impact across all three of these core pillars.

To collect data we work collaboratively with our project partners. They include project developers, on-the-ground implementing organizations, and the communities and participants directly involved in and impacted by the project. We also support them in their own analysis and quality assurance, and conduct our own data collection and analysis through Geographic Information Systems (GIS) monitoring and site visit assessments for projects in our investment portfolio.

These combined monitoring activities provide a clear picture of our projects' impact on climate, environment, and community — and their alignment with high-quality standards. Let’s look more closely at those three pillars:

Climate Benefits

Projects follow science-backed methodologies from vetted carbon registries to measure the metric tons of carbon dioxide (or CO2 equivalent) removed or avoided by their project. We review all carbon calculations used by our investment projects to maintain accuracy and support the desired climate impacts.

Climate data gathered from partners can include:

• Third-party verification reports of credits issued and metric tons of CO2e removed or avoided.
• Carbon sequestration estimates from GIS/geospatial analysis.
• Test and sample reports from third-party labs.
• Detailed calculations of removal and emissions reductions following registry methodologies.

Environmental Benefits

Through our nature-based projects, we aim to restore millions of hectares of degraded and deforested forests and natural habitats; protect existing forests and ecosystems; and improve management practices on working lands, ranchlands, and agroecosystems. In doing so we also provide habitat for wildlife and opportunities for species populations to grow.

Environmental and biodiversity indicators we collect from relevant projects include:

• Hectares restored, protected, or brought under sustainable land management.
• Number of trees planted and their survival rates.
• Above-and-below-ground carbon biomass, including soil carbon where applicable.
• Native species richness, population size, and habitat change over time.

Community Benefits

The success of projects relies on the participation of the communities residing within project areas and making their livelihoods off the land. Projects often occur within the Global South and among communities that are lacking in resources, traditionally marginalized, and vulnerable to climate disaster and disruption.

Our investment projects not only move forward with the willing participation of communities, but also adhere to a high standard of delivering direct community benefits.

Our project partners share data demonstrating these community impacts, including:

• How much carbon revenue is passed on to communities by project developers, direct employment of community members, or shared community benefits. Our investment projects share a portion of developer revenue with communities.
• The number of community members directly employed by the project, and how their wages compare with national living wages.
• Improvements to participant living conditions and removal of barriers to maintaining sustainable livelihoods — which could include time and money saved on household energy, capacity to implement sustainable farming practices, or improvements in crop diversity or outputs.
• Shared community benefits — if the project builds a school or community center, for instance, or the project funds a health education program.

To glean all of this critical impact indicator data, we work with partners to track both short-term and long-term metrics. Thus, we can see the project's short-term impact — think hectares protected, or training and employment opportunities for community members — as well as long-term sustainable change, such as species diversity, overall biomass growth, or increased food security for the community.

Like our process with GIS and geospatial data, Catona Climate reviews partner results and conducts our own analysis with relevant data. By collecting this indicator data, we can aggregate learnings across our portfolio of projects and also provide support to our partners in assessing their impact.

And that’s what project quality boils down to for us: a wide spectrum of positive impact — for the planet, for the areas where the projects take place, and for the people who call those places home.

Stay tuned for the next installment of our blog series as we further explore elements of our monitoring system.